Florida Woman Indicted on 14 Felony Counts in Rihanna Home Shooting
Ivanna Lisette Ortiz faces attempted murder charges after allegedly firing an AR-15 at Rihanna and A$AP Rocky's Beverly Hills home where their children were present.
Ivanna Lisette Ortiz faces attempted murder charges after allegedly firing an AR-15 at Rihanna and A$AP Rocky's Beverly Hills home where their children were present.
A Florida woman has been indicted on 14 felony counts, including attempted murder, for allegedly driving across the country to fire a rifle at the home of Rihanna and A$AP Rocky in March. Ivanna Lisette Ortiz, 36, of Orlando, appeared in a Los Angeles courtroom this week after undergoing months of psychiatric evaluation to determine her competency to stand trial.
The grand jury indictment, which was unsealed Wednesday, came a day after a judge ruled that Ortiz is mentally fit to proceed. Her attorney entered a not guilty plea on her behalf while she stood in court wearing yellow jail clothes. The judge set her bail at $2.6 million.
On March 8, authorities say Ortiz drove a Tesla to the gates of the celebrity couple’s Beverly Hills-area property and fired at least 20 rounds from an AR-15 style rifle. The shooting was indiscriminate and chaotic. Bullets tore through an Airstream trailer where the couple was inside, and shots also struck the wall of their home’s nursery where their three young children, ages all under 5, were with their nanny.
Rihanna’s mother and several staffers were also present in the home during the incident. In addition to targeting the couple’s residence, Ortiz also fired shots toward a neighboring house. Despite the volume of gunfire and the number of people in the vicinity, remarkably no one was physically injured.
“This is a person who wanted to kill Rihanna,” Deputy District Attorney Alexander Bott told reporters outside the courtroom. “Everyone else was collateral damage.”
The new indictment supersedes the original charges filed in March and includes 10 counts of assault with an assault weapon, one for each person present at the two properties involved. Three additional counts relate to shooting at an inhabited dwelling or camper. The couple’s three children, Rza, Riot and Rocki, are named as victims in the indictment. These assault weapon counts carry stiffer sentences than the original charges of assault with a semiautomatic firearm.
Ortiz faces a potential life sentence if convicted on all counts. The case, which appeared to stall after psychiatric evaluations were ordered shortly after her arrest, is now moving to trial on a fast track.
One of the most puzzling aspects of this incident is the complete lack of apparent motive. Prosecutors have not cited any connection between Ortiz and Rihanna. Court documents and psychiatric evaluations remain sealed, leaving the public without insight into Ortiz’s mental state or any explanation for why she targeted the entertainment industry superstar and her family.
Ortiz, a longtime licensed speech pathologist with no prior criminal record, had no obvious criminal history before this alleged attack. When arrested, she told investigators: “I wasn’t attempting murder,” but her defense team has not elaborated on this statement or presented any public argument regarding the charges.
Her attorney, Deputy Public Defender Derek Dillman, did not comment to reporters, and the public defender’s office has remained quiet beyond entering the not guilty pleas.
Rihanna, a nine-time Grammy Award winner, has established herself as one of the most successful recording artists in history. She’s earned 14 No. 1 hits on the Billboard Hot 100, including chart-toppers like “We Found Love,” “Work,” “Umbrella” and “Disturbia.” Beyond music, she’s expanded into entertainment and business ventures, making her one of the industry’s most recognizable figures.
The use of secret grand jury proceedings in this case allowed prosecutors to bypass California’s typical preliminary hearing process, where evidence must be presented publicly to determine if a trial is warranted. This move, combined with the three-month delay while her competency was being assessed, has raised questions about how the justice system handles cases involving mental health evaluations.
As the case moves forward, the sealed psychiatric records and the mysterious lack of motive continue to shroud this shocking incident in uncertainty.
Source material from AP News