LA School Superintendent Under FBI Investigation Over $3M Tech Deal Gone Wrong

The Los Angeles Unified School District just handed us a masterclass in how things can unravel when big money meets loose oversight. Alberto Carvalho, the superintendent who arrived in LA as an education reformer with an impressive resume, is now on paid leave while federal investigators dig into his involvement with a business deal that collapsed spectacularly.

Here’s what we know so far. The FBI served search warrants at Carvalho’s home, the district’s headquarters, and a property in Miami connected to someone who helped broker the deal. The trigger? A $3 million contract with AllHere, an education technology company that promised an AI chatbot named “Ed” to help students but instead delivered a cautionary tale about due diligence.

When a Tech Deal Becomes a Disaster

Let’s back up. In 2024, Carvalho heavily promoted the AllHere partnership. The district paid $3 million for this AI chatbot solution. Three months later, they dropped it. Within months, AllHere filed for bankruptcy, and its founder Joanna Smith-Griffin got indicted on securities fraud, wire fraud, and identity theft charges.

Now here’s where it gets interesting. Debra Kerr, who helped connect AllHere with LA schools, was supposed to pocket a $630,000 commission for brokering the deal. She never got paid. According to reporting from The 74, Kerr had longstanding ties with Carvalho from his previous job running Miami-Dade County schools. Her son even worked for AllHere and pitched the technology to LA leadership after Carvalho took the job.

The Timing and the Denials

Carvalho has denied personal involvement in selecting AllHere, which is the kind of statement that typically appears when things are about to get complicated. After Smith-Griffin’s indictment, he promised to form a task force to examine what went wrong. Surprise, surprise: no public announcements have emerged since.

The school district is cooperating with investigators, they say. But cooperation and actual accountability are two different things, especially when you’re talking about half a million students and millions in public funds that somehow found their way into a collapsing fraud scheme.

A Resume That Doesn’t Match the Headlines

Here’s the weird part. Carvalho actually has a solid track record. He won Superintendent of the Year from the national superintendents association back in 2014. Spain literally knighted him for his work expanding Spanish-language programs in Miami. He came to LA during a difficult moment, flush with COVID-19 relief funding but struggling with enrollment and learning losses.

He also became a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdowns, especially after raids hit Los Angeles last year. He sparred with Ron DeSantis over pandemic mask mandates back in Florida. So on paper, this is a guy who looked like he was going to do serious work.

But contracts don’t sign themselves, and $3 million doesn’t just disappear into a fraudulent company by accident. Someone has to have been paying attention. Or not paying attention, which might be exactly what the FBI wants to understand.

The real question isn’t whether Carvalho personally knew Smith-Griffin was running a fraud scheme. It’s whether anyone in leadership at the nation’s second-largest school district bothered to ask the basic questions that should get asked before you hand $3 million to an unproven technology company. When a superintendent with an international reputation can’t seem to remember the details of a massively expensive contract, that’s when you know the investigation probably isn’t just about one person’s involvement.

Written by

Adam Makins

I can and will deliver great results with a process that’s timely, collaborative and at a great value for my clients.